A Low-Cost Lidar Based IoT System for Real-Time Remote Groundwater Level Monitoring: Design, Validation and Field Deployment

Michael Atenaga; Samuel Azi

doi:10.62292/njp.v35i4.2026.625

Authors

Michael Atenaga
michaelatenaga@gmail.com

Federal University of Petroleum Resource Effurun
Samuel Azi
University of Benin

Keywords:

Groundwater monitoring, Lidar, Low-cost sensors, Real-time telemetry

Abstract

Groundwater level monitoring is essential for sustainable water management, yet many developing regions lack affordable real-time infrastructure. This study presents the design, construction, and field validation of a low-cost, non-contact groundwater monitoring device integrating a Lidar-Lite v3HP time-of-flight sensor, an Arduino Uno microcontroller, and an ESP8266 Wi-Fi module for telemetry to the ThingSpeak IoT platform. The implemented device was powered by a 20,000mAH, 5V power bank and deployed on two artesian wells in Oghara, Delta State, Nigeria, the prototype was validated against manual tape measurements at depths of 167–739 cm. A linear correction factor derived from regression analysis mitigated systematic bias. Results showed near-perfect correlation (r = 0.99995) between Lidar and tape measurements, with the correction factor reducing root mean square error (RMSE) from 10.28 cm and 13.91 cm to 3.91 cm and 5.36 cm for Wells 1 and 2, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis confirmed a ten and three-fold decrease in bias respectively, while the coefficient of variation remained below 1.21%. With an average upload latency of thirty-three seconds, the system enables sub-minute monitoring, offering a robust, economically viable solution for expanding groundwater networks in resource-constrained regions.

Dimensions

REFERENCES

Ali, M., Akbar, A., Waqar, M., Zhang, X. & Ahmed, A. (2024) An overview of deep learning applications in groundwater level modelling: bridging the gap between academic research and industry applications, Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2024, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9480522.

Altman D.G. & Bland J.M.(1983). Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician, 32, 307–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2987937

Behzadian, A., Zhang, L., Adu-Gyamfi, Y. & Buttlar, W. (2025). Feasibility and reliability assessment of inexpensive solid-state lidar for rutting measurement in asphalt pavement, Transportation Research Record, 2679(1), pp. 12-25.

Benjamin, J., & Kaplan, D. (2017). Development of a laser-based water level sensor for fine-scale ecohydrological measurements. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SusTech.2017.8333522

Boon, J. D., Heitsenrether, R. M., & Hensley, W. M. (2012). Multi-sensor evaluation of microwave water level measurement error. In Proceedings of OCEANS 2012 (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2012.6405079

Born, M., & Wolf, E. (2019). Principles of optics: Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light (7th expanded ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769914

Calderwood , A. J., Pauloo, R. A., Yoder , M. A., & Fogg, G. E., (2020). Low-Cost, Open Source Wireless Sensor Network for Real-Time, Scalable Groundwater Monitoring. Water, 12, 1066; 1 – 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041066

Cobbing, J., Roy, K., Islam, H.M.N.,Singh, G. &WaterAid (2021). Analysis of the groundwater resource and governance in Bangladesh, Ghana, India, Nepal and Nigeria [Report]. WaterAid. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355576124 [Accessed 19/10/2024]

Christakis, I., Tsakiridis, O., Sarri, E., Triantis, D. & Stavrakas, I. (2024). Nonlinear regression approach as a correction factor of measurements of low-cost electrochemical air quality sensors. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3282. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083282

Dementria D.D.A.,Medina, G.A.V.A., Guico, M.L.C., Kwong, J.C.T., Galicia, J.K.A., & Retirado, M. G. F.(2023). Fully Automated Telemetry System for Underground Water LIDAR Sensor. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS), pp 72 – 78 . https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTaIS60147.2023.10346073

García-López, S., Vélez-Nicolás, M., Zarandona-Palacio, P., Curcio, A. C., Ruiz-Ortiz, V., & Barbero, L. (2023). UAV-borne LiDAR revolutionizing groundwater level mapping. Science of the Total Environment, 859(1), 160272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160272

Garmin. (2018). LIDAR-Lite v3HP operation manual. Garmin Ltd. https://static.garmin.com/pumac/LIDAR-Lite_v3HP_Instructions_EN.pdf [accessed 30/10/2024]

Giavarina , D. (2015). Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Medica ;25(2):141–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.015

Healy, R.W., and Cook, P.G. Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeology Journal 10, 91–109 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0178-0

Igwebuike, N., Ajayi, M., Okolie, C. & Anike, L. (2025) .Application of machine learning and deep learning for predicting groundwater levels in the West Coast Aquifer System, South Africa, Earth Science Informatics, 18, p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01623-w

Jimenez-Olmedo, J. M., Tortosa-Martínez, J., Cortell-Tormo, J. M., & Pueo, B. (2024). Assessing the Validity of the Ergotex IMU in Joint Angle Measurement: A Comparative Study with Optical Tracking Systems. Sensors, 24(6), 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24061903

Kalu, N. N. (2018). Groundwater management protection program for Nigeria. RUDN Journal of Ecology and Life Safety, 26(3), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2018-26-3-367-378

Kondapuram, A. R., Treytl, A., Bigler, T., & Sauter, T. (2024, January). Design and evaluation of an IoT-based real-time underground water-level sensor system. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Applied Sensing Conference (APSCON) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSCON60364.2024.10466069

Masood, A.,Tariq, M.A.U.R., Hashmi, M.Z.U.R., Waseem, M., Sarwar, M.K., Ali, W., Farooq, R., Almazroui, M.,& Ng, A.W.M., (2022). An Overview of Groundwater Monitoring through Point-to Satellite-Based Techniques. Water, 14, 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040565

Nielsen, D.M. & Nielsen,G.L.,(2007). The essential handbook of ground-water sampling. CRC Press. http://www.taylorandfrancis.com

Paul, J. D., Buytaert, W., Allen, S., & Harrison, R. (2020). Technical evaluation of LiDAR-based river water level measurements. Water Resources Research, 56(9), e2019WR026810. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026810

Ruttner, P., Voordendag, A., Hartmann, T., Glaus, J., Wieser, A. & Bhler, Y. (2025) 'Monitoring snow depth variations in an avalanche release area using low-cost lidar and optical sensors', Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 25(6), pp. 1315-1331. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1315-2025

Sony (2021). Sony develops a stacked direct time of flight depth sensor for automotive Lidar with SPAD pixels, an industry first, Tokyo, Sony Corporation. Available at https://www.sony.com/en/Sonyinfo/News/Press/202102/21-016E/ (Accessed 18/2/2026).

Taylor, C. J. & Alley W. M., (2001). Ground-water-level monitoring and the importance of long-term water-level data. U.S. Geological Survey circular , 1217, page 42. https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1217/html/pdf.html

Viegas, V., Dias Pereira, J.M., Girão, P.M. & Postolache, O. (2021) Study of latencies in ThingSpeak', Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 6(1), pp. 342–348. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj060139

Wu, Z., Huang, Y., Huang, K., Yan, K., & Chen, H., (2023). A Review of Non-Contact Water Level Measurement Based on Computer Vision and Radar Technology. Water, 15(3233), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15183233

A Low-Cost Lidar Based IoT System for Real-Time Remote Groundwater Level Monitoring: Design, Validation and Field Deployment

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

REFERENCES

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

How to Cite

Latest publications

Information

Browse

Make a Submission