Clinical Impact of MRI Artifacts on Neuroimaging Cases in Nigerian Hospitals: A Retrospective Study with Protocol Optimization Recommendations

Authors

Keywords:

MRI artifacts, Protocol Optimisation, MRI quality assessment

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts impact diagnostic accuracy in low-resource settings, where scanner access and maintenance differ from high-income regions. Understanding artifacts distribution is crucial to identifying common patterns, sequence-, orientation- and gender-specific issues, allowing targeted improvements. This study analyzes 100 brain MRI scans (50 low-field/0.36T, 50 high-field/1.5T) from Ibadan, Nigeria, to characterize artifact prevalence by sequence, orientation, and gender. Using Python-based heatmaps and interpretable machine learning, we quantified artifact patterns and identified key predictors. Motion artifacts were the most frequent (31.4% in 1.5T; 27.1% in 0.36T), particularly in axial T1/T2 sequences. Notably, hardware-related artifacts (e.g., RF inhomogeneity) were rare, underscoring operational efficiency. Machine learning models, despite limited dataset size, highlight sequence type as the top artifact predictor (feature importance: 0.72). We propose protocol adjustments (e.g., prioritizing FLAIR over T1/T2) may reduce artifacts by 30% for high fields and not less than 26% for low fields (prioritizing T2* over T1/T2). Our findings provide actionable insights for radiologists in resource-constrained environments, bridging a critical gap in global MRI quality assessment.

Dimensions

Budrys, T., Veikutis, V., Lukosevicius, S., Gleizniene, R., Monastyreckiene, E., & Kulakiene, I. (2018). Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging: How it can really affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis? Journal of Vibroengineering, 20(3), 1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2018.19472

Chavhan, G. B. (2016). Appropriate selection of MRI sequences for common scenarios in clinical practice. Pediatric Radiology, 46(5), 740–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3548-5

Eira, R., Michael, H., Michael, R., Alice, S. H., & Jack, P. (2016). Artifacts affecting musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: Their origins and solutions. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 45(5), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.09.002

Feuerriegel, G. C., & Sutter, R. (2024). Managing hardware-related metal artifacts in MRI: Current and evolving techniques. Skeletal Radiology, 53(8), 1737–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04637-7

Havsteen, I., Ohlhues, A., Madsen, K. H., Nybing, J. D., Christensen, H., & Christensen, A. (2017). Are movement artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging a real problem?—A narrative review. Frontiers in Neurology, 8, Article 232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00232

Ho, C. H., Xiao, L., Kwok, K. Y., Yang, S., Fung, B. W. H., Yu, K. C. H., Chong, W. H., Yeung, T. W., & Li, A. (2023). Common artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging: A pictorial essay. Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, 26(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr2317552

Krupa, K., & Figatowska, M. (2015). Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Polish Journal of Radiology, 80, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.12659/PJR.892628

Manso, J. M., Ravi, K. S., Jin, Z., Oyekunle, D., Ogbole, G., & Geethanath, S. (2022). ArtifactID: Identifying artifacts in low-field MRI of the brain using deep learning. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 89, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2022.03.011

Mohammed, S., & Abubakar, M. (2020). Evaluation of MRI artifact in some selected centers in Kano metropolis, Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 20(4), 1831–1839. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v20i4.35

Noda, C., Venkatesh, B. A., Wagner, J. D., Kato, Y., Ortman, J. M., & Lima, J. A. C. (2023). Primer on commonly occurring MRI artifacts and how to overcome them. RadioGraphics, 43(1), e220062. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220062

Ogbole, G., Odo, J., Efidi, R., Olatunji, R., & Ogunseyinde, A. O. (2017). Brain and spine imaging artefacts on low-field magnetic resonance imaging: Spectrum of findings in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 24(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_34_17

Saranathan, M., Worters, P. W., Rettmann, D. W., Winegar, B., & Becker, J. (2017). Physics for clinicians: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 46(6), 1590–1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25821

Somasundaram, K., & Kalavathi, P. (2012). Analysis of imaging artifacts in MR brain images. Oriental Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 5(1), 135–141.

Tawfik, A. I., & Kamr, W. H. (2020). Diagnostic value of 3D-FLAIR magnetic resonance sequence in detection of white matter brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51, Article 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00334-8

Yıldızer, K. E. (2017). Effect of patient anxiety on image motion artefacts in CBCT. BMC Oral Health, 17, Article 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0364-7

Zamzam, A. E. A., Aboukhadrah, R. S., Khalil, M. M., et al. (2022). Diagnostic value of three-dimensional CUBE fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging and its axial MIP reconstruction in multiple sclerosis. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00734-0

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Lawal, A. O., Abodunrin, O. P., Adesola, A. E., Obed, R. I., & Ogbole, G. I. (2026). Clinical Impact of MRI Artifacts on Neuroimaging Cases in Nigerian Hospitals: A Retrospective Study with Protocol Optimization Recommendations. Nigerian Journal of Physics, 35(3), 258-266. https://doi.org/10.62292/njp.v35i3.2026.578

How to Cite

Lawal, A. O., Abodunrin, O. P., Adesola, A. E., Obed, R. I., & Ogbole, G. I. (2026). Clinical Impact of MRI Artifacts on Neuroimaging Cases in Nigerian Hospitals: A Retrospective Study with Protocol Optimization Recommendations. Nigerian Journal of Physics, 35(3), 258-266. https://doi.org/10.62292/njp.v35i3.2026.578