Empirical Study of Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms for Accelerating Functional Materials Discovery

Authors

Keywords:

Quantum machine learning, Variational quantum circuits, Materials informatics, NISQ devices, Quantum random forests

Abstract

Quantum machine learning (QML) represents a convergence of quantum computing and statistical learning theory with transformative potential for high-throughput computational materials discovery. This empirical study systematically benchmarks six QML architectures — quantum kernel support vector machines, variational quantum eigensolvers augmented by graph neural networks, quantum approximate optimization algorithm hybrids, quantum random forests, quantum Boltzmann machines, and parameterized quantum circuit-based neural networks — against their classical analogues across five material classes comprising perovskite oxides, battery cathode materials, two-dimensional semiconductor alloys, metal-organic frameworks, and high-entropy alloys. Using 14,720 DFT-computed property records drawn from the Materials Project and AFLOW databases as the common evaluation corpus, the QML methods achieved mean absolute error reductions of 38–61% and training time compressions of 29–61% relative to equivalent classical estimators at equivalent dataset sizes. The quantum random forest architecture exhibited the strongest overall performance (MAE = 0.026 eV; R² = 0.978), while hardware-native implementations on IBM Quantum Eagle and IonQ Forte achieved practical speed-ups of 28x–41x over CPU-based baselines. Barren plateau pathology and noise-induced gradient suppression remained the principal barriers to scaling beyond 50 qubits on current NISQ hardware. The empirical results of this study established principal conclusions that advance the theoretical and practical understanding of QML in materials discovery contexts. These findings provide grounding for deploying QML in production materials informatics pipelines.

Dimensions

Batatia, I., Kovacs, D. P., Simm, G., Ortner, C., & Csanyi, G. (2022). MACE: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 11423–11436.

Batra, R., Song, L., & Ramprasad, R. (2021). Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning. Nature Reviews Materials, 6(8), 655–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y

Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2022). Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(1), 015004. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015004

Caro, M. C., Huang, H. Y., Cerezo, M., Sharma, K., Sornborger, A., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2022). Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data. Nature Communications, 13(1), 4919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32550-3

Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K. & Coles, P. J. (2021). Variational quantum algorithms. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(9), 625–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9

Cerezo, M., Sone, A., Volkoff, T., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2022). Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21728-w

Choudhary, K., DeCost, B., Chen, C., Jain, A., Tavazza, F., Cohn, R., & Brorsson, J. (2022). Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science. npj Computational Materials, 8(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00734-6

Curtarolo, S., Hart, G. L. W., Nardelli, M. B., Mingo, N., Sanvito, S., & Levy, O. (2013). The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nature Materials, 12(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3568

Faber, F. A., Christensen, A. S., Huang, B., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2021). Alchemical and structural distribution based representation for universal quantum machine learning. Journal of Chemical Physics, 148(24), 241717. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5020710

Harrigan, M. P., Sung, K. J., Neeley, M., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Neven, H., Martinis, J. M., & Rubin, N. C. (2021). Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor. Nature Physics, 17(3), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01105-y

Huang, H. Y., Broughton, M., Mohseni, M., Babbush, R., Boixo, S., Neven, H., & McClean, J. R. (2021). Power of data in quantum machine learning. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9

Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., ... & Ceder, G. (2013). Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Materials, 1(1), 011002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323

Kim, Y., Eddins, A., Anand, S., Wei, K. X., van den Berg, E., Rosenblatt, S., ... & Kandala, A. (2023). Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance. Nature, 618(7965), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3

King, A. D., Raymond, J., Lanting, T., Harris, R., Zucca, A., Altomare, F., & Amin, M. H. (2023). Quantum critical dynamics in a 5,000-qubit programmable spin glass. Nature, 617(7959), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05867-2

Manzhos, S., & Carrington, T. Jr. (2021). Neural network potential energy surfaces for small molecules and reactions. Chemical Reviews, 121(16), 10187–10217. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00665

Moses, S. A., Baldwin, C. H., Allman, M. S., Ancona, R., Ascarrunz, L., Barnes, C., & Kim, J. (2023). A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor. Physical Review X, 13(4), 041052. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041052

Reuter, K., Margraf, J. T., & Csanyi, G. (2021). Kernel-based machine learning for efficient simulations of molecular liquids. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 17(8), 4657–4666. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00175

Ryu, J., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2023). Quantum machine learning for material property prediction: Metal-organic frameworks. npj Computational Materials, 9(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-00995-x

Schuld, M., & Killoran, N. (2019). Quantum machine learning in feature Hilbert spaces. Physical Review Letters, 122(4), 040504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.040504

Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., & Sherborn, G. (2022). The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices. Physics Reports, 986, 1–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003

Wright, K., Beck, K. M., Debnath, S., Amini, J. M., Nam, Y., Grzesiak, N., & Monroe, C. (2023). Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer. Nature Communications, 10(1), 5464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13534-2

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Nwachuku, D. N., & Ugochukwu, E. E. (2026). Empirical Study of Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms for Accelerating Functional Materials Discovery. Nigerian Journal of Physics, 35(3), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.62292/njp.v35i3.2026.565

How to Cite

Nwachuku, D. N., & Ugochukwu, E. E. (2026). Empirical Study of Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms for Accelerating Functional Materials Discovery. Nigerian Journal of Physics, 35(3), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.62292/njp.v35i3.2026.565

Most read articles by the same author(s)