Assessment of Radiographic Film Quality in Some Selected Hospitals in Benue State

Main Article Content

N. B. Akaagerger
Victor Gyaase
D. K. Kaki
I. A. Philip

Abstract

The essence of diagnostic radiology is to obtain a high quality image with low radiation dose to patient. Since radiology is aimed in producing images which provide adequate information for the clinical purpose with minimum radiation dose to the patient, we seek to assess the high image qualities that are produced in the darkroom. The processing time and the temperature, at which these films were processed, stored and also evaluated, were carried out in the darkroom. Agfa films were used throughout the procedure in four different hospitals, H-1, H-2, H-3 and H-4 and the processing chemicals were observed for the period of a month. Therefore, in H-1, the average temperature was found to be 29oC, average temperature was 26oC in H-2; in H-3, average temperature was 30oC and the average temperature in H-4 was found to be 29oC which all fall above the standard temperature limit (25oC) as recommended by National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP). From the experimental proceedings in the darkroom, the distance from safelight to workbench, it shows that H-1 and H-2 do not conform to the standard while H-3 and H-4 are in conformity. The result obtained from darkroom fog test shows that, the Optical Density Difference (ODD) for H-1, H-2, H-3 and H-4 was found to be 0.16, 0.07, 0.18 and 0.35 respectively, which were all found to be above the ICRP standard limit (0.05).  This implies that, most hospitals in Makurdi operates below the set darkroom practices as recommended by NCRP and ICRP which affects the quality of image as a result of high temperature, poor concentration in processing chemicals and some effect of fogging in the darkroom which needs to be checked.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Akaagerger, N. B., Gyaase, V., Kaki, D. K., & Philip, I. A. (2024). Assessment of Radiographic Film Quality in Some Selected Hospitals in Benue State. Nigerian Journal of Physics, 32(4), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.62292/njp.v32i4.2023.169
Section
Articles

References

Akaagerger N. B., Aligba E. H., Philip A. (2016). Assessment and evaluation of Radiology Darkroom in Benue State University Teaching Hospital and Federal Medical Centre Makurdi. PP1-4

Dunn M. A. and Rogers A. T. (1998). X-ray flm reject analysis as a quality indicator. Medical physics and IT Services, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 IPB U.K. International Journal of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Therapy.Radiography, 4. Pp. 29-31

Verdonck B., Nijlunsing R., Melman N., Geijer H. (2001). Image quality and X-ray dose for translation reconstruction overview imaging of the spine, colon and legs. Proceedings of Computed Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Elsevier Sciences, Journal ISSN 0531-5131. pp. 500–505

Watkinson S. Moores B. M., S.J. Hill S. J. (1984) Reject Analysis: Its role in quality assurance.U.S National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Radiography, 50, pp. 189–194

Geijer H., Beckman K. W., Anderson T., Persliden J. (2001). Radiation dose and image quality with a flat panel amorphous silicon digital detector. Depertment of Medicine and Care, Radiology. Linkoping University, Faculty of Science. ISSN 0938-7994, E-ISSN 1432-1084, Vol. 11, no. 9. p. S280.

Beir V (1990). Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academy Press, Washintogton. University of Michigan volume 5.

Stewart C. Bushong, (2001). Radiography science for technologist physics, biology and protection. 7th edition. St Louis; Mosby year book pp109-286.

Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc.(CRCPD) 1030 Burlington Lane, Suite 4B Frankfort, KY 40601

Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD), (1999), Committee on Quality Assurance in Diagnostic X-ray (H-7). Minimum Quality Control Recommendations for Diagnostic X-Ray Facilities (Draft).

National Conference on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Report Number 99, Assurance for Diagnostic Imaging Equipment,

National Conference on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Report Number 105, Radiation Protection for Medical and Allied Health Personnel